Monday, August 16, 2010

Veron Foods recalls Several HEAD CHEESE/ SAUSAGE Products

Louisiana's agriculture department says Veron Foods LLC of Prairieville is recalling 250 tons of ready-to-eat sausage and hog's head cheese because of possible contamination by bacteria.

The Department of Agriculture and Forestry says investigation of an illness revealed a sample contaminated with Listeria bacteria, which can cause an uncommon but potentially fatal disease.

FULL STORY: http://www.totalrecallinfo.com/freerecalls.php?id=19562

Wright County Egg recalls SHELLED EGGS

The following statement was released by officials of Wright County Egg regarding the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) on-farm records review and egg testing for Salmonella.

Wright County Egg of Galt, Iowa is voluntarily recalling specific Julian dates of shell eggs produced by their farms because they have the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella. Salmonella is an organism which can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Healthy persons infected with Salmonella often experience fever, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in the organism getting into the bloodstream and producing more severe illnesses such as arterial infections, endocarditis or arthritis.

Eggs affected by this recall were distributed to food wholesalers, distribution centers and foodservice companies in California, Illinois, Missouri, Colorado, Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. These companies distribute nationwide.

FULL STORY: http://www.totalrecallinfo.com/freerecalls.php?id=19561

Carrefour recalls Frozen MINCED STEAK---Belgium

CARREFOUR CALLS A LOT MINCED STEAK (FROZEN) OF THE MARK CARREFOUR DISCOUNT BACK

It only to products the next extreme expiry date: 18/06/2011

To occasion of a self Calls Carrefour a fate chopped steaks back that in the frozen section be sold under the mark Carrefour Discount in the Carrefour hypermarkets, Carrefour GB / Market supermarkets and Carrefour Express convenience stores.

During the usual control that Carrefour was performed bacteria Escherichia Coli 026 H11 observed.

FULL STORY: http://www.totalrecallinfo.com/freerecalls.php?id=19557

The Sheep Fjord recalls Silk Jersey CHEESE---Quebec

Presence of Listeria monocytogenes in cheese

The Ministry of Agriculture , Fisheries and Food ( MAPAQ ) , in collaboration with the company " The sheep Fjord , located at 2992, Chemin du Plateau , Saguenay, warning people who have in their possession cheese " Silk Jersey purchased between July 16 and August 13, 2010 at various retail locations , do not eat it , because it may contain bacteria Lm.

The cheese is the subject of this notice is being sold in variable weight and size is on its packaging the name " Silk Jersey .

FULL STORY: http://www.totalrecallinfo.com/freerecalls.php?id=19558

Highland Farms Supermarket recalls GREEN ONIONS---Ontario

CERTAIN GREEN ONIONS SOLD AT HIGHLAND FARMS SUPERMARKET, NORTH YORK, ONTARIO, MAY CONTAIN SALMONELLA BACTERIA

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is warning consumers not to consume Green Onions described below as they may be contaminated with Salmonella.

The affected Green Onions were sold unwrapped with a rubber band. There is no lot code sticker, UPC or product name on the individual bunch of onions.

The product was sold from Highland Farms Supermarket, located at 4750 Dufferin Street in North York, Ontario on July 30, 31 and August 1, 2010.

FULL STORY: http://www.totalrecallinfo.com/freerecalls.php?id=19559

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Questions about our recall policy?

Many consumers have contacted us regarding recalls which are posted late, or are completed.

Here are 2 examples!

http://www.totalrecallinfo.com/freerecalls.php?id=19552


http://www.totalrecallinfo.com/freerecalls.php?id=19545

The first is for apple slices, the second for cosmetic creams.

The problem is NO-ONE knows about these recalls until we announce them. They cannot be found on the FDA recall page, nor could we get any comments on how to get these recalls when they are fresh.

It seems as though a conspiracy exists to announce some recalls while some get put on the back burner, and never get to the consumer.

We have contacted the relevant agencys, with no response.

So the fact that these are older recalls, do not dismiss them. No other government/private organization has these recalls in their database, so they need extra special attention, as some of these are very dangerous.

Please feel free to comment to the FDA about the "Phantom Recalls"

This notice is for all users of our services.

Understanding the Continuous Cause of Product Recalls & Product Liability Lawsuits

We're not getting better at designing and launching reliable new products for the market place, as statistics prove, we're getting worse.

By Randall Goodden, author

Aug. 11, 2010

In our never ending effort to boost sales and profits and be the first to hit the competitive market with new products and technologies, streamlining production costs and improving efficiencies, and the constant search for new supply sources as well as new sales markets, we continue to fail to see our own deficiencies in new product development as related to design and engineering. Most of this is due to our common lack of knowledge as to what we really need to be doing, versus the common misconception that we already know what to do.

We're not getting better at designing and launching reliable new products for the market place, as statistics prove we're getting worse. Product recalls are at record numbers, and have been growing every year for the past six years

FULL STORY: http://www.industryweek.com/articles/understanding_the_continuous_cause_of_product_recalls__product_liability_lawsuits_22492.aspx

Monday, August 9, 2010

FDA Seeks Injunction Against Colorado Manufacturer of Cultured Cell Product

Media Inquiries: Shelly Burgess, 301-796-4651, shelly.burgess@fda.hhs.gov

Consumer Inquiries: 888-INFO-FDA

FDA Seeks Injunction Against Colorado Manufacturer of Cultured Cell Product

Violations of current good manufacturing practice and labeling requirements cited

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is seeking an injunction in federal court against Regenerative Sciences LLC, of Broomfield, Colo., citing violations of current good manufacturing practice (cGMP) that cause its cultured cell product to be adulterated. The product is also misbranded due to the lack of adequate directions for use and the failure to bear the “Rx only” symbol.

The company’s cultured cell product is derived from a patient’s bone marrow or fluid surrounding the patient’s joints (synovial fluid). The cells are grown, processed, and mixed with drug products outside the body before being injected back into the patient.

Regenerative Sciences’ cultured cell product is not approved by the FDA, and no adequate and well-controlled studies have been done to demonstrate its safety or effectiveness for any indication.

“FDA recognizes the importance of the development of novel and promising new therapies,” said Karen Midthun, M.D., acting director of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. “However, when companies like Regenerative Sciences fail to comply with FDA laws and regulations, they put the public’s health at risk.”

The complaint for the injunction was filed Aug. 6, 2010, by the Justice Department on behalf of the FDA in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, against Regenerative Sciences and three of its employees, Christopher J. Centeno, M.D., John R. Schultz, M.D., and Michelle R. Cheever. The injunction would permanently prevent the company and cited individuals from adulterating and misbranding the cultured cell product while the product, or one or more of its components, is held for sale after shipment in interstate commerce.

Regenerative Sciences has agreed to cease production of the cultured cell product while the case is pending.

The FDA warned Regenerative Sciences about its cGMP violations as recently as June 2010. The company failed to make sufficient corrections, and the conduct of the individuals cited in the complaint demonstrates refusal to comply with the law.